Freezing injunctions and pollution claims

Sep 02 2014


The Commercial Court has granted insurance and P&I service provider Gard a freezing order over the assets of the 1971 International Oil Pollution Compensation (IOPC) Fund.*

International Group of P&I Clubs and the fund on 18th March, 2014, the fund’s director advised of his intention to recommend at the fund’s next meeting, to be held on 6th-9th May, 2014, that the money left in the fund (about ?4.6 mill) should be returned to the contributors.

Court application

This prompted Gard to apply to the English High Court for a freezing order. This application was heard before Mr Justice Hamblen on 1st May and judgement was handed down on 7th May, 2014.

The fund argued that the Court lacked jurisdiction because:

A) The fund had immunity from the grant of freezing order relief.

B) The fund had immunity from Gard’s claims (i) in England and (ii) in Venezuela.

The Headquarters Agreement between the fund and the UK and IOPC Fund (Immunities and Privileges) Order 1979 set out immunities on which the fund can rely in the UK.

The order contains a specific exception to immunity in respect of ‘a loan or other transaction for the provision of finance’.

The Judge held that Gard had a good arguable case that the practice of payment between the clubs and the fund fell under this head. Consequently, he ruled that the Court did have jurisdiction to decide the application.

He also found that Gard had met the legal test for a freezing order by establishing a good arguable case that they were entitled to an indemnity because of this practice and demonstrating a real risk that the fund would dissipate its assets by returning the funds to the contributors.

Accordingly, the Judge granted a freezing order in respect of the claims in the English proceedings. However, he did not accept that Gard had a good arguable case that the fund did not have immunity in Venezuela.

There is not enough left in the fund to settle this, or the other four outstanding compensation cases. The fund has applied to the High Court to set the claim in England aside and the case could progress to an appeal and ultimately the Supreme Court, which could prevent the winding up of the fund for some time.

If the 1971 monies are depleted, this raises the question of whether the fund could levy further contributions under a convention which is no longer in force. Nissos Amorgos was subsequently converted to an FPSO and renamed BW Joko Tole and is still in service.

*This article was taken from Holman Fenwick and Willan’s (HFW) bulletin and was written by associate Helen McCormick.



Related News

OneOcean launches EnviroManager+

(Jul 30 2020)

OneOcean has made some clever advancements to its world-leading environmental compliance platform, and announces the launch of EnviroManager+.



UK warns of “catastrophic environmental threat” from hazardous Yemeni oil tanker

(Jul 30 2020)

The UK has called on the Houthis in Yemen to give UN experts access to an oil tanker off its west coast, in a bid to prevent an environmental catastrophe.



U.N. still waiting for Houthi approval to visit decaying oil tanker off Yemen

(Jul 30 2020)

The United Nations was still waiting for Yemen’s Houthi group to authorize deployment of an assessment team to a decaying oil tanker that is threatening to spill 1.1 million barrels of crude oil off the war-torn country’s coast last Tuesday.



UN urged to prevent Houthi oil ‘disaster’

(Jul 09 2020)

Yemen’s government has urged the UN Security Council to intervene to prevent a derelict tanker from leaking more than a million barrels of oil into the Red Sea.



ABS advice on finding a low carbon strategy

(Jul 02 2020)

There is much to read about different approaches to low carbon shipping, but very little of it actually guides you, as a tanker operator, as to what you should do. ABS is aiming to fill this gap.



June 2020

low carbon strategy - digital tanker market models - battery explosions - better catering onboard - challenges of ballast installations