Reports of battery explosions on tankers

Jul 30 2020


There have been a number of reports of battery explosions onboard vessels, with potential for human injury and fire. Shipbuilding consultant Narayana Prakash explains how they can happen and what to do to prevent them.

There have been numerous incidents of so-called “maintenance free” batteries catching fire and exploding on board ships.

 

Fortunately no-one has been injured from these incidents.

 

However such explosions have the potential to inflict serious injuries, such as permanent blindness and permanent skin damage, and can be the cause of fires.

 

In each instance, the batteries involved were the larger automotive ‘maintenance free’ type with no provisions for periodic topping up with water of the electrolyte (internal acid fluid). The exploded battery was under warranty.

 

The explosions have typically occurred several months after the battery was installed.

 

An unsafe condition may be created when a battery cell has a high concentration of hydrogen and gas due to a plugged or defective vent cap.

 

Also, overcharging the battery can result in electrolysis in the electrolyte (water and acid) – creating hydrogen and oxygen.

 

If enough hydrogen and oxygen accumulates in the battery, then vents out from the internal pressure, when it comes into contact with a spark, it will explode.

 

“Maintenance free” is a carefree description for starter batteries. Even where batteries do not require periodic water additions, maintenance requirements still extend to charging, cleaning battery tops, periodic re-tightening of battery connections, testing to confirm the working condition of the battery.

 

The “maintenance free” battery also loses water due to evaporation. Wherever there is an opening provided to top up the battery with water, topping up must be carried out.

 

During inspections

One explosion took place while a vetting inspector was onboard an oil tanker  and witnessed during his presence.

 

The ship staff had been carrying out safety checks onboard ship, including trying out the emergency generators.

 

The panic situation coupled with blame games made all the ship staff demotivated.

 

In most cases of the observed explosions, the emergency generator would not start at the  first attempt, leading to checks on terminals and battery circuits.

 

But the repeated attempted starts will increase the sparks and waiting hydrogen for explosion.

 

If this happens while a Port State Control or vetting inspection is in progress, you should request the inspector carry on with other inspections and in meantime investigate the issues.

 

Suggested control measures

These control measures are suggested for starter batteries.

 

On board ships the battery can be placed in an enclosed box with sufficient ventilation provided for the gases to liberate out freely.

 

Eye protection can be used whenever handling battery maintenance activities.

 

The capacity of the battery should be carefully selected at design stage. In no case it must be of insufficient capacity.

 

The battery charging circuit should provide constant voltage. When operated at the recommended charging voltage, they maintain the battery at or near full capacity and provide automatic replenishment of charge following a discharge.

 

Use a battery that has provisions for periodic top-ups with water, and provision for monitoring of liquid levels in all cells.

 

Any bulging of the battery within the warranty period should be reported and battery discarded immediately.

 

Sparks are mostly generated from slip on type connections.  The wasted terminal is normally wound with copper strips to tighten again and the dangerous situation arises. Nut bolt tightening is better.

 

Operating starting batteries at temperatures above 25ºC will lead to higher water loss and shorter service life.

 

It would be prudent to place an instruction regarding periodic battery level check and top up of distilled water if required near Emergency and GMDSS Batteries.

 

Investigation

One investigation by an equipment manufacturer said there was less electrolyte in the battery. The plates inside the battery collapsed and touched one another causing short circuit. 

 

The underlying cause was that the periodic check for electrolyte was not done in the last several months due to the battery being termed as “maintenance free.”

 



Previous: Developments with scrubbers at Pacific Green

Next: Oil tanker rescues Baker Lake men after canoe capsizes


Related News

North P&I and Standard Club announce merger plan to create new global marine insurance force

(Mar 17 2022)

Combination would establish a global marine insurer positioned to thrive in the face of current and emerging challenges and opportunities posed by digitalisation, recruitment, regulation and sustainability.



Oil shipping costs soar for key routes on Russian invasion

(Mar 03 2022)

The escalating crisis over Ukraine has catapulted the cost of shipping oil by sea.



IUMI insurance update – losses, seafarers, carbon

(Feb 07 2022)

The International Union of Marine Insurance (IUMI) provided an update on important issues to tanker operators relating to insurance, including trends in loss rates, seafarer issues and decarbonisation, following its September 2021 annual event.



North P&I Club seeks 15% premium on P&I rates

(Nov 18 2021)

Describing 2021 as “one of the most challenging years on record”, North P&I Club’s latest Pre-Renewal Report, published today, calls for “robust action” in the form of increasing mutual P&I rates at the forthcoming renewal to confront the challenge o...



IUMI – how tanker insurance is changing

(Jul 09 2021)

The International Union of Marine Insurance (IUMI) provided an update on issues affecting marine insurance in new ways over 2020, with some elements specific to tankers, discussing changes to tanker usage affecting risks, cybersecurity, climate chang...



June July 2025

Tanker Operator Athens report - MEPC 83 explained - decarbonisation by Norwegian shipowners